I do know a little about how you get New York teachers to clap, though. It's largely because each and every UFT member at the convention is a member of the Unity Caucus, the group that’s controlled the UFT
virtually since its inception.
The caucus is open only by invitation, and there
are very particular rules one must follow, when and if invited. You can access the application here by
clicking download.
Here’s one part of the agreement:
To express criticism
of caucus policies within the Caucus;
That’s healthy, of course. If something’s wrong, it behooves
you to let people know about it. It’s the next part that, although it pretty much explains everything, is a little disturbing:
To support the
decisions of Caucus/ Union leadership in public or Union forums;
Thus, every single "Union activist" in attendance is bound to do whatever they're told. Does this applause for Gates represent the membership? Certainly not those who really know what Gates is all about.
Would it really be that dangerous to allow UFT members to tell Gates their real thoughts? And would Gates show up if he thought that had half a chance of happening?
Most perplexing is this--how can you be an "activist" if you're sworn not to express any but pre-approved thoughts?
Most perplexing is this--how can you be an "activist" if you're sworn not to express any but pre-approved thoughts?
To be continued...